>>            

Read These First
One Hand Clapping
By Chris Ryall
RSS Channel
For anyone with an RSS Newsreader
The Old Site
From the Movie
Film Columns
Film Flam Flummox
By Michael Dequina
From Print to Screen
By Matthew Savelloni
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
By Matt Singer
International Intrigue
By Alison Veneto
Lights! Cameras! Zombies
By John McLean
Nocturnal Admissions
By D.K. Holm
Strange Impersonation
By Kim Morgan
Trailer Park
By Christopher Stipp
Theater
From Screen to Stage
By Kevin Hylton
DVD
DVD Diatribe
By D.K. Holm
DVD Late Show
By Christopher Mills
Poop Shoot Entertainment
Game On!
By Ian Bonds
The Inner View
Celebrity Interviews
Kentucky Fried Rasslin'
By Scott Bowden
Mail Shoot
By Us and You!
Squib Central
By Joshua Jabcuga
Toy Box
By Michael Crawford
TV Pilot Review
By Chris Ryall
TV Recommendations
By Chris Ryall
Movie Poop Shoot Web Comics
Spook'd
By Stevenson and Damoose
Brat-Halla
By Stevenson and Damoose
Power Hour
By Odjick and Austin
Enchanted Mayhem
By DeBerry and Cunard
Femme Noir
By Mills and Staton
Captain Capitalism
By Brad Graeber
Comics
All Ages
By Tracy (& Shelby & Sarah) Edmunds
Comics 101
By Scott Tipton
Preachin' from the Longbox
By Britt Schramm
Should It Be a Movie
By Marc Mason
Music
Music for the Masses
By M.C. Bell
Books
Back to Movie Poop Shoot
Home - back to the Poop Shoot


Week of March 13, 2006

You can take "The Peacemaker," "Deep Impact," and "The Tuxedo." We'll take "Gladiator," "American Beauty" and anything else that didn't suck.

Emilio's 17

Yeah, like he needed all that overpriced crap anyway...

This lawsuit's going to make 'House Party' look like 'House Party Two!'

I told you... don't call me SENIOR!!

Maybe this is all a bad dream too?

Thanks Sharon, but I think I'll wait until this one comes out on DVD (so I can freeze frame of course)

There is absolutely, positively no nepotism in Hollywood. None.

You're good, baby, I'll give you that... but me? I'm magic.

This band will go down like a lead balloon

Well, Goodbye there Children...

They can't sell the Capitol Records building! What will be left to destroy in the next crappy 'end of the world' movie?

Same old Courtney - still sponging off Kurt

Panic on the streets of Austin

You're a fat, Botox faced, wig-wearing ninny! Oh yeah? Well your band has a dirty H addict as a lead singer!

Black Sabbath, Blondie, Miles Davis, The Sex Pistols, Lynyrd Skynyrd Enter Rock Hall



01 THE BREAK-UP $39.17
$12759/av

02 X-MEN: THE LAST STAND $34.02
$9159/av

03 OVER THE HEDGE $20.65
$5170/avg

04 THE DAVINCI CODE $18.61
$4953/avg

05 MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE III $4.68
$1756/avg

06 POSEIDON $3.49
$1283/avg

07 RV $3.20
$1469/avg

08 SEE NO EVIL $2.04
$1607/avg

09 AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH $1.36
$17615/avg

10 JUST MY LUCK $855K
$892/avg









 


 
My Mind is Free

 

THE MATRIX RELOADED opens late tonight. Most of the press has now seen it, and we can all hear the snapping and growling out there. The wolves have been fed, but the food isn't digesting the way some of them had expected and so their stomachs are feeling upset and unsatisfied. I am not one of them. My stomach feels just fine. But I'm having some honest second thoughts about the character of the meal.

My first MATRIX RELOADED reaction, which I posted two hours after exiting the Steve Ross theatre last Thursday night, was an unqualified "wow!" Then my jangled nervous system, which had been expertly assaulted and manipulated earlier that evening, began to settle down, and a more considered opinion started to take shape.

THE MATRIX RELOADED is probably the best and smartest super-flick any of us are going to see this summer, and perhaps throughout the whole year. But the more I reflect upon it, the more I realize it's a bag of mixed groceries. Inventive, out-there, visually spellbinding and pulsing with extraordinary thematic energy, it nonetheless lacks the sureness of touch and completeness of vision that the original THE MATRIX had. It's a knockout in many ways, but it doesn't quite feel at the end of the day like a triple-somersault, big-tittied, surfer-chick humjob.

Maybe it'll kick in after the second viewing this Thursday morning at the Cannes Film Festival (a journalist friend has told me that it all came together for him after viewing #2), and of course one can never expect a bridge chapter in a three-part trilogy to deliver the wholeness and dimension of a well-composed first or third installment.

And I'm comforted by a line I included in one of my recent Wachowski Brothers profiles (in either RAZOR of French PREMIERE....I forget which) that came from a former Silver Pictures executive. "You know that MATRIX REVOLUTIONS is the real deal, right?," he told me. "RELOADED is just a tease."

So understand I'm not really trashing RELOADED, but I am saying, in a manner of speaking, "If only..." In my secret and extremely delicate geek heart, for instance, I've been hoping for months that RELOADED would be to THE MATRIX what THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK was to STAR WARS. And it's not, I'm afraid. Well...it is and it isn't.

It's a faster moving piece that, like all follow-ups, has been freed of the burden of having to set up the basics. Like EMPIRE, it's more visually arresting and more sexually developed. (Han and Leia never got naked-sweaty and did the deed, like Neo and Trinity do here, but their desire for each other was certainly more pronounced.) And it's certainly more of an amped-up, extra bells-and-whistles thing (one of the critics has referred to it as MATRIX 2.0).

But RELOADED doesn't really out-maneuver or add significant depth to the original. I watched THE MATRIX all over again when I got home last Thursday night, and there's no escaping the fact that it's a simpler, cleaner, more elegant piece.

On the other hand, I can't imagine the bulk of the MATRIX faithful not being satisfied by RELOADED. It's a safe bet that hundreds of thousands will want to see it a second time, and perhaps even a third. (It's such a dense and challenging thing it almost demands a re-viewing.) I wouldn't get into a strenuous argument with anyone who insists it's a masterwork, or even a better film than the original. (Who's right about such things?) Certainly in box-office terms, it's going to make history. I'm figuring $300 million or thereabouts in this country alone.

Everyone knows the plot rudiments. The Matrix is a computer-generated illusion of an ordered world we think we all live in, but don't. The only people who get what's really going on and are fighting the architects of this deception are the Neo-led rebels.

RELOADED's story is a ticking-clock that unwinds over a 72-hour period, which is roughly the time rebel leaders estimate it will take for 250,000 "sentinels" -- burrowing high-tech probes sent by the villains -- to dig their way down to Zion and waste the populace. The task of somehow preventing this holocaust falls upon the sturdy shoulders of Neo (Keanu Reeves), who can now fly around like Superman and even stop bullets in mid-air.

The first act, much of it set in Zion, is basically dialogue and sex and political in-fighting among the rebels about which course is best in order to stop the machines. (I admire the fact that writer-directors Andy and Larry Wachowski had the balls to keep things settled and meditative for the first 35 or 40 minutes, and make the action junkies wait for it.) Things finally turn jazzy when Neo visits the Oracle (the late Gloria Foster) and she tells him the way to stop the machines is to hook up with the Keymaker (Randall Duk Kim), who knows how to get into the mainframe of the Matrix. But first Neo, Trinity and Larry Fishburne's Morpheus have to get around a corrupt sensualist named the Merovingian (Lambert Wilson) who is holding the Keymaker captive.

The big payoffs are in the two big action sequences -- the "burly brawl" (Neo duking it out with scores of Huge Weaving's, a.k.a., "Smith" clones) and the legendary 14-minute car chase -- and in the suspense generated over the final half hour in which Neo has to decide how and if he can save Trinity (Carrie Ann Moss) from a dark fate he's been seeing in his dreams since the very beginning.

The car chase is unquestionably cool, but some critics have complained about the logic of the burly brawl. Since Neo can just fly out of harm's way any time he chooses, why fight all these assholes in the first place? A fair question, and here's the answer: THE MATRIX RELOADED is a kung fu movie at heart, and martial-arts sequences in kung fu movies are never logical and never resolve a damn thing. They're just about guys kicking and bopping each other and leaping around, dude. They're musical numbers, is all.

One could answer that RELOADED kind-of stops dead when the burly brawl happens because it's just about some beautiful Yuen Wo Ping choroegraphy and cutting-edge photography, and it's about nothing crucial in terms of story, or anything else for that matter that advances the story in the slightest. It is, however, very cool from a cyber Busby Berkeley perspective.

Other coolnesses are delivered by Wilson when he talks about how sublime it is to swear in French, and how "it's like wiping your ass with silk." I especially loved the actor who plays the Architect (Anthony Wong). His third-act scene with Neo reveals disturbing questions about the real nature of the Matrix-vs.-the-rebellion conflict. It's also a scene in which Neo realizes he has to choose between saving the human race or saving Trinity. (Whoa.)

SCREEN DAILY's Mike Goodridge made a good point when he said that RELOADED's "best moments are simple and human, such as [costar Monica] Bellucci's demand for a kiss from Neo, or the love scenes between Reeves and Moss which makes for a believable romance." I guess what I've been trying to say all along is that the original MATRIX had more of these moments than its successor, and that's one reason why I feel it sinks in deeper.

Don't let me stop anyone from seeing RELOADED (as if any of you give a damn what any critic has to say). Just keep in mind you may have to see it twice to get the full import. I am definitely hoping something extra will happen when I catch it again later this week.

It Ain't Bad

That unappealing one-sheet for THE IN-LAWS I tore into last Friday was not indicative of the quality of the film. Warner Bros. distribution snuck it nationwide last Saturday evening, and I could see the reasoning. I paid my $9.50 with everyone else, and laughed out loud maybe eight or nine times. And that was okay . Comedy's a bitch, and if a mid-range effort like this gets it mostly right and doesn't stumble too badly or leave you feeling burned, it gets a pass.

Wait a minute... a perverse scenario is taking shape. Could the Warner Bros. marketers have issued that terrible poster knowing it would lower expectations, but also knowing the film would pick up fairly good word-of-mouth out of last weekend's sneak, and that this buzz would be have a greater impact due to the fact that no one who'd glanced at the one-sheet would have expected it to be any good? Or am I too caught up in my own ball of twine?

A remake of a fondly-remembered 1979 comedy, THE IN-LAWS gets by on attitude (rakish, anarchic) when the laughs aren't quite firing as hot and heavy as they could be. As a team, Michael Douglas and Albert Brooks may not have quite the inspired chemistry Peter Falk and Alan Arkin seemed to generate in the original. But on his own terms, Douglas really uncorks himself with the role of a father of the groom with a disruptive professional life (i.e., he's a renegade ex-CIA guy involved in black-market shenanigans), and delivers one of the most winning performances of his career. And he doesn't look as 60ish in the film as he does in the poster. He looks fine, actually. Remarks withdrawn.

Brooks, playing the father of the bride, does his usual whining neurotic number and scores more often than not. I just wish Brooks, one of the best and wittiest comic writer-directors of our time, could be more prolific and punch out more of his own movies at a faster rate. He told me a couple of years ago at a Sundance party that he not only reads this column, but has it bookmarked. Made my day.

The best laugh of the whole thing comes at the very end and involves several well-dressed people getting wet. I didn't just chuckle or chortle at this; I was actually aroused and made several "hah-hah" sounds. It's great when this happens during a comedy. You're really into it, suddenly.

David Suchet is almost funny as a gay international criminal type. That's not to say he isn't good. He's an excellent actor -- I just didn't laugh at his stuff. Richard Libertini played more or less the same role in the '79 version. Candace Bergen is also pretty good as Douglas's neurotic ex-wife.

The big standout for me was Ryan Reynolds (VAN WILDER, DICK), as Douglas's son. He wasn't given any funny lines and is pretty much stuck in a straightjacket, but there's a purely visual reaction he has to the chaotic onslaught at the finale that's nearly perfect. I suspect he's much better and brighter than what his pre-IN LAWS performances have displayed Maybe he'll get lucky out of this.

I have one location-shoot beef with THE IN-LAWS, and that was the decision to film a scene that is supposed to be taking place on a large estate in France that I instantly knew hadn't been shot there. Too many fucking pine trees, for one thing. I checked with the IMDB and sure enough, the production never set foot on French soil. (The scene was shot in Ontario, Canada.) The scene in question was shot in Ontario, Canada. This is sloppy, Andrew Fleming! Word to the wise: If you're going to fake a location, fake it so people like me don't notice it.

Docked at Cannes

I hit the tarmac in Nice at 2 pm this afternoon. It's now 6:20 pm and it's very warm and rather sticky here. I'm already on my second shirt. I'm supposed to meet some friends (among them Paramount Classics chief Ruth Vitale and Columbia Uniedsity film professor Annette Insdorf) 40 minutes from now on the outside terrace of La Pizza, a large, folksy restaurant overlooking the Cannes harbor for dinner and lots of talk.

Vitale has invited me to another dinner directly following this one. I've gotten myself invited to a lot of foodie gatherings this year. If you're on the right circuit here you never have to buy your own grub, although the restaurants here are so alluring it's hard not to succumb. But if you don't watch it you can burn through your life savings here. The prices of everything are absurd. It's already starting to tick me off.

The grind starts tomorrow morning with an 8:30 a.m. screening of THE MATRIX RELOADED, followed by a photo op and a press conference. (Keanu and Carrie Ann, I'm presuming, and definitely producer Joel Silver.) Shari Springer Berman and Robert Pulcini's AMERICAN SPLENDOR, a drama about cartoon satirist Harvey Pekar (played by Paul Giamatti), screens later in the day. The producers are trying to build on the excitement about this film that began at last January's Sundance Film Festival, where I didn't manage to see it.

Jet lag usually comes over me in the late afternoons and early evenings, so it'll be pretty much a constant application of triple espressos and eyedrops for the first couple of days.

Friday morning will start with a breakfast party thrown by HBO Films and production executive Colin Callender, followed by Peter Bart interviewing Joel Silver at the VARIETY tent, followed by a screening of Roger Michel's THE MOTHER..

Saturday will include a press conference thrown by the stars and makers of HBO's THE LIFE AND DEATH OF PETER SELLERS. There's also an HBO dinner set for early evening on the beach. Saturday is also a TERMINATOR 3 day with press gatherings and interviews being given by Arnold Schwarzenegger and director Jonathan Mostow, although no T3 footage will be shown during the festival.) (Not even a 20-minute product reel, like the one Miramax showed last year to promote GANGS OF NEW YORK.) The day will conclude with a big MTV-sponsored T3 party that'll be held, I'm told, out at "the old Pierre Cardin mansion" somewhere in the hills.

Sunday will include screenings of the new Hector Babenco film, CARANDIRU, and the Francois Ozon film SWIMMING POOL, along with the usual gatherings. The following week will include showings of Errol Morris's THE FOG OF WAR, a documentary about former Defense Secretary Robert MacNamara, and Lar von Trier's DOGVILLE with Nicole Kidman and Paul Bettany.

Distributors looking for acquisitions will be paying attention to DOGVILLE, Paul Morrison's WONDROUS OBLIVION, David MacKenzie's YOUNG ADAM with Ewan MacGregor, a film I'm too lazy to investigate called BELLEVILLE RENDEZVOUS (I have to be at the airport in less than three hours!), Kiyoshi Kurosawa's BRIGHT FUTURE, Claude Miller's PETITE LILI and Emily Young's KISS OF LIFE.

But give me time to get into it, please. I just got here. All I want to do is relax and drink coffee and breathe it all in. Those news stories about an oil slick gumming up the festivities are bunk. Black glop may be floating somewhere out there, but I couldn't see it or smell it as I stood on the beach a couple of hours ago.



 

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

Mail this page to someone you know.
Recipient's Name:
Recipient's Email:
Sender's Name:
Sender's Email:

Email Jeffrey
Got a comment or tip? Send it in!

Archive
Want more Hollywood Elsewhere, and access to all the old Hollywood Confidential's? Check out our archive.
Speculation that the New York Film Festival "snubbed" Wes Anderson's The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou is untrue, according to a spokesperson. The festival committee saw Aquatic last June, in tandem with plans to open the sea-faring comedy-drama in October or thereabouts. And while "they liked it and wanted it," a decision was later made for Touchstone to open Aquatic in December, and the notion of a NYFF debut didn't seem quite as desirable.
Aquatic's opening is set for 12.10 in New York and Los Angeles, and 12.24 wide. I would normally be scratching my head over the title expansion (i.e., adding with Steve Zissou), as this sort of thing usually indicates indecision and therefore trouble on some level. But here the addition sounds droll and all of a piece, as with all things Anderson. I also imagine that Anderson, like any director from Spielberg on down, welcomed the extra time to tweak and fine-tune.
A suggestion that may not save the James Bond franchise, but will at least halt its downhill slide: arrange for producers Michael Wilson and Barbara Broccoli to be gently but firmly kidnapped and then taken to an undislcosed location (somewhere in Southeast Asia would be best), where they will be kept in two lavish homes under house arrest, with allowances for family visitations. Once this is done, all serious interest in Eric Bana playing the new 007 will cease and Wilson and Broccoli's successors can look at other options.
One of these options should, of course, be to shut the series down. Just because the Bond movies continue to make money doesn't mean they're dead inside, and that one of most compassionate acts anyone could do would be to fire a bullet into the skull of this outdated, cliche-ridden franchise and walk away proud....like Pierce Brosnan has done. Bana is said to be unsure about stepping into the 007 series, according to London's Evening Standard. The tabloid says an offer has gone out to him but that Bana is "currently deciding whether it's something he really wants to sign up [for]." Translation: he's heard the Wilson-Broccoli stories. Eric Bana would be to the 007 tradition as Lex Barker was to the Tarzan series in the 1950s.
A suggestion that may not save the James Bond franchise, but will at least halt its downhill slide: arrange for producers Michael Wilson and Barbara Broccoli to be gently but firmly kidnapped and then taken to an undislcosed location (somewhere in Southeast Asia would be best), where they will be kept in two lavish homes under house arrest, with allowances for family visitations. Once this is done, all serious interest in Eric Bana playing the new 007 will cease and Wilson and Broccoli's successors can look at other options.
One of these options should, of course, be to shut the series down. Just because the Bond movies continue to make money doesn't mean they're dead inside, and that one of most compassionate acts anyone could do would be to fire a bullet into the skull of this outdated, cliche-ridden franchise and walk away proud....like Pierce Brosnan has done. Bana is said to be unsure about stepping into the 007 series, according to London's Evening Standard. The tabloid says an offer has gone out to him but that Bana is "currently deciding whether it's something he really wants to sign up [for]." Translation: he's heard the Wilson-Broccoli stories. Eric Bana would be to the 007 tradition as Lex Barker was to the Tarzan series in the 1950s.
Hold up on that rumble about the conniving heavyweight behind Ted Griffin's firing off the Graduate-sequel flick not being Jennifer Aniston, but costar Kevin Costner. The Fly on theWall guy claimed in an 8.16 posting, using quotes from an anonymous crew member, that Griffin's dismissal "was totally Kevin's fault, not Jennifer's."
But now another guy who was right in the thick of the situation says this account is "completely false," due to the fact that "Costner hadn't started working" on the film at the time Griffin's dismissal went down. Hey, I'm just passing this along.
The Entertainment Weekly cover (#779-780) asks if Johnny Depp's performance as J.M. Barrie in Finding Neverland (Miramax, 10.22) will deliver a Best Actor Oscar...and in so doing indicates an obvious rooting interest on the part of EW staffers (film critics Owen Gleiberman and/or Liza Schwarzbaum, it's safe to presume) in at least helping Depp land a nomination. In the face of such a boldly-put suggestion, I think it's fair to offer a counter-opinion, which is that Depp's acting in this tenderly composed biopic may be too exacting for its own good.
In other words, Depp seems to really "get" the eccentric Scottish playwright who wrote Peter Pan , who, according to the press notes, was said to have a quiet, puckish personality and always spoke in a low burr. And that's Depp in the film. The problem is that his Barrie seems so internal, so into his own quiet determinations and oddball kindnesses, that you feel a strange urge to strangle him after a while. Plus there's something too actorly about his Scottish accent; it sounds at once uncertain and overly studied. In short, Depp did everything right...and in so doing created a character and a vibe that feels curiously wrong.
You like a filmmaker, you find him/her intriguing, you try to show interest and support and....test pattern. I became curious about Abel Ferrara's supposed next film, Mary, in which Vincent Gallo will play an actor playing Jesus Christ in a film-within-the-film. (This, at least, is what the Brown Bunny star-director-producer told me last week.) The focus of Mary, says Gallo, is the actress who plays the mother of Christ, and who experiences a kind of spiritual satori as a result of immersing herself in the part. The film, Gallo adds, is supposed to shoot in Rome in late September or early October.
But of course, there can be no contact whatsoever with Ferrara. The guy almost never calls back anyone, I've heard. It's always, "I'll call you." An e-mail to Ferrara's Rome-based producer resulted in zip. Ferrara's New York attorney, Jay Julien, professed a general ignorance about Mary, and couldn't direct me to anyone with a history of replying to phone calls who might. I've learned that whenever it's this much trouble to get hold of someone, it's usually not worth the effort in the first place.
Sofia Coppola is set to direct a period costume drama about Marie Antoinette and husband King Louis XVI for Columbia. Wigs and hoop gowns, the French revolution, let 'em eat cake, the guillotine...all that good stuff. This is a joke, right? The reasonably talented Sofia hasn't shown a glimmer of the kind of commanding, exacting vision that the lensing of any historical drama of this sort would require. I mean, presuming Columbia wants something at least half as good, say, as Barry Lyndon, which they probably couldn't care less about.
But I am looking forward to watching Kirsten Dunst, who will play Antoinette, get her head cut off. And you have to admire the sense of humor that Coppola and her casting director have shown in choosing Jason Schwartzman ("Max" in Rushmore) to play her husband Louis. If they stick to history, he'll also lose his head. Valor, Max...valor! You won't feel a thing. A tickling sensation, your head falls in the basket, everything turns numb, and then blackness. You can do that standing on your head. Oops..sorry.
Regarding the recent death of King Kong star Fay Wray, Move City News' David Poland wrote that Peter Jackson, director of an all-new King Kong flick, "wanted Ms. Wray to close his film with the 'Twas Beauty That Killed The Beast' line, but, ever the lady, Ms. Wray was unwilling (though attempts at persuasion continued) because she felt it would be arrogant to call the character she played -- and thus, herself -- a beauty."
Apart from the utterly nonsensical thinking conveyed in Wray's alleged view, the item is another worrisome indicator that Jackson's King Kong is going to be way too Jackson-y. (Which is to say movie-mucky to the point of suffocation.) Can you imagine a line as important as that one -- the big closer! -- given to a 96 year-old woman as an affectionate gesture, however heartfelt on Jackson's part? Art is art and emotions are emotions, and never the twain shall meet. If Jackson is handing out cameo kicker lines as tokens of respect to grand old ladies, forget it....it's over. John Ford once told Nunnally Johnson that to be a good director you have to be a bit of a bastard. This, conversely speaking, may be Jackson's problem. He's too mushy, too much of a sweetheart.
This is old news now, but those people who described Collateral's box-office performance last weekend as "so-so" or " middling" or whatever were being a tad dismissive. Unfair, really. A movie as dark as this one, with a gray-haired Tom Cruise playing a cold-hearted assassin, is doing great by taking in $24 million during its first weekend. Only three other Cruise films -- Minority Report and the two Mission Impossible's -- have had better openers.
And Exhibitor Relations' Paul Dergarabedian must have been smokin' some strong stuff before telling the New York Times' Sharon Waxman that Collateral "is not a movie that can be supported by teenagers." He's saying...what? That teenagers can't deal with urban thrillers about cops and hit men and what-all? That beautifully rendered mood and ace dialogue don't impress them? I should add there was a different reaction to the film when I saw it with a paying crowd last weekend. They didn't applaud, but the two industry crowds I saw it with earlier did. Hmmmm.
Ben Affleck was his usual glib self during his hanging-out-in-Boston segment with Katie Couric a couple of days ago...same-old, same-old...but something different happened when he did a chat thing with Hardball's Chris Matthews on Tuesday afternoon. He was focused, sharp, and quick, and had some very cogent things to say about Kerry-vs.-Bush, voter sentiments and the general lay of the land.
In other words, he did himself a huge favor. For the first time in a very long time Affleck was suddenly about something besides Bennifer, chasing girls, iffy movies and gambling sprees. He said he might want to jump into politics down the road, since the movie career thing has its limits in terms of feeling fulfilled or spiritually nourished. He also told Matthews he'd like to have his job, and Matthews said in response, "I do fear you."












Addicted to Bad
by Patrick Keller

International Intrigue
by Alison Veneto

Nocturnal Admissions
by D.K. Holm

Strange Impersonation
by Kim Morgan

Trailer Park
by Christopher Stipp




New DVD Releases
for April 11, 2006

DVD Diatribe
by D.K. Holm

DVD Late Show
by Christopher Mills




Preachin' from the Longbox
by Britt Schramm

Should It Be a Movie?
by Marc Mason

New Comic Book Releases
for April 12, 2006, 2006




New CD Releases
for April 11, 2006

Music for the Masses
by M.C. Bell




TV Recommendations
Boob toob picks of the week by Chris Ryall

Kentucky Fried Rasslin'
by Scott Bowden

TV Pilot Review Archives
by Chris Ryall



                        © Copyright 2002-2006 Movie Poop Shoot