>>            

Read These First
One Hand Clapping
By Chris Ryall
RSS Channel
For anyone with an RSS Newsreader
The Old Site
From the Movie
Film Columns
Film Flam Flummox
By Michael Dequina
From Print to Screen
By Matthew Savelloni
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
By Matt Singer
International Intrigue
By Alison Veneto
Lights! Cameras! Zombies
By John McLean
Nocturnal Admissions
By D.K. Holm
Strange Impersonation
By Kim Morgan
Trailer Park
By Christopher Stipp
Theater
From Screen to Stage
By Kevin Hylton
DVD
DVD Diatribe
By D.K. Holm
DVD Late Show
By Christopher Mills
Poop Shoot Entertainment
Game On!
By Ian Bonds
The Inner View
Celebrity Interviews
Kentucky Fried Rasslin'
By Scott Bowden
Mail Shoot
By Us and You!
Squib Central
By Joshua Jabcuga
Toy Box
By Michael Crawford
TV Pilot Review
By Chris Ryall
TV Recommendations
By Chris Ryall
Movie Poop Shoot Web Comics
Spook'd
By Stevenson and Damoose
Brat-Halla
By Stevenson and Damoose
Power Hour
By Odjick and Austin
Enchanted Mayhem
By DeBerry and Cunard
Femme Noir
By Mills and Staton
Captain Capitalism
By Brad Graeber
Comics
All Ages
By Tracy (& Shelby & Sarah) Edmunds
Comics 101
By Scott Tipton
Preachin' from the Longbox
By Britt Schramm
Should It Be a Movie
By Marc Mason
Music
Music for the Masses
By M.C. Bell
Books
Back to Movie Poop Shoot
Home - back to the Poop Shoot


Week of March 13, 2006

You can take "The Peacemaker," "Deep Impact," and "The Tuxedo." We'll take "Gladiator," "American Beauty" and anything else that didn't suck.

Emilio's 17

Yeah, like he needed all that overpriced crap anyway...

This lawsuit's going to make 'House Party' look like 'House Party Two!'

I told you... don't call me SENIOR!!

Maybe this is all a bad dream too?

Thanks Sharon, but I think I'll wait until this one comes out on DVD (so I can freeze frame of course)

There is absolutely, positively no nepotism in Hollywood. None.

You're good, baby, I'll give you that... but me? I'm magic.

This band will go down like a lead balloon

Well, Goodbye there Children...

They can't sell the Capitol Records building! What will be left to destroy in the next crappy 'end of the world' movie?

Same old Courtney - still sponging off Kurt

Panic on the streets of Austin

You're a fat, Botox faced, wig-wearing ninny! Oh yeah? Well your band has a dirty H addict as a lead singer!

Black Sabbath, Blondie, Miles Davis, The Sex Pistols, Lynyrd Skynyrd Enter Rock Hall



01 THE BREAK-UP $39.17
$12759/av

02 X-MEN: THE LAST STAND $34.02
$9159/av

03 OVER THE HEDGE $20.65
$5170/avg

04 THE DAVINCI CODE $18.61
$4953/avg

05 MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE III $4.68
$1756/avg

06 POSEIDON $3.49
$1283/avg

07 RV $3.20
$1469/avg

08 SEE NO EVIL $2.04
$1607/avg

09 AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH $1.36
$17615/avg

10 JUST MY LUCK $855K
$892/avg









E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

Nocturnal Admissions


By D.K. Holm

May 13, 2005

[nota bene: The following column, by necessity, contains some spoilers! If you don't want to know the ending of the movies mentioned, don't read on.]

Sith City

STAR WARS EPISODE III: REVENGE OF THE SITH
Early in STAR WARS III: THE REVENGE OF THE SITH, Anakin Skywalker and Obi Wan Kenobi are attempting to rescue Supreme Chancellor Palpatine from captivity in the hands of General Grievous. They've managed to make it on board the ship through a phalanx of impediments; have battled their way down hallways; and now need to find their way to another level of the ship. But there is one more impediment.

"The elevator's not working," says Skywalker.

That the fate of an empire rests in the fragile functionality of an elevator is just the type of absurdity with which Anthony Lane might beat a pop culture phenomenon over the head, howling at its overwrought pretensions.

But in fact this moment gets to the very heart of what we must now call the first three STAR WARS films.

Episodes I, II, and now III are all varying meditations on living spaces and working conditions. If PHANTOM MENACE is about desert living and work as slavery, then SITH is about cities and their corrupting influences. It is here that Palpatine can mask his real activities. It is within the serpentine layers of floating apartment buildings that Anakin can be secretly married to Padme. And it is here that the politics of a galaxy far, far away, with its Trade Federations and Jedi counsels and so forth, can be so Byzantine as to defy casual understanding.

The first film was about places above and below ground, desert above, and water below. The second film was about artificial cities, filled with robots. Now the third shows a culture at the far end of its development, about to topple from its own corruption, like Athens and Rome before it. Anakin is subject to the exhortations of Palpatine because he has been "weakened" by the city, and in his weakness he performs a ritual transition slaughter that mirrors an atrocity done against his own people in the second film.

In other words, the three STAR WARS films are coherent. They are all of a piece. In fact, this new third film is so good, so great in fact that it has made me rethink my low opinion of its two predecessors.

Yes, REVENGE OF THE SITH is a great film. And I knew it was great from about five minutes in, when a ship crash lands in a landing bay and a dynamic Kenobi leaps out and chops up a few evil robots. It's stunning. If I had not been watching the film with a bunch of jaded, caustic film critics a wave of applause and cheering would have swept across the auditorium.

I don't know what the rest of the world will think, but the geeks will probably be disappointed yet again and the adults will sniff at all the childishness again. For my part, I found it to be a powerfully moving experience. There is a moment when Anakin and Padme are alone in their respective quarters but looking out over the city toward each other. The film cuts between them. I actually got teary eyed.

I wept later too when Kenobi cries to his betraying friend, "You were the chosen one!" It could have been the whole valedictory thing around STAR WARS right now, the sense of a chapter in the culture coming to a close (and the movie hasn't even opened yet), the kind of journalistic sentimentality that is bound to give Lucas a pass in many quarters, but I think it really was the movie. It's that well put together that it makes you weep over these overly well known pop culture characters. I used to think that Lucas's films went down hill when Marcia Lucas stopped editing them, but this one is so well put together that it did evoke for me the great pleasure I took out of STAR WARS 1976 back in the day.

The whole last sequence of SITH evokes the feel of Coppola's GODFATHER, when all the family business is taken care of on one day. Some have suggested that Coppola advised Lucas on this final film, but a Talkbacker at AICN claimed that Lucas was the influence on Coppola on those final sequences in the Godfather films (a look through a few Lucas and Coppola bios failed to turn up evidence for that, but I'm still looking). Whatever the foundation, Lucas handles this powerful, wrenching sequence masterfully.

So engrossing is the film that I forgot that Yoda, usually an annoying character to me, was computer generated. He is so integrated into REVENGE OF THE SITH on such a fundamental level that I was carried along with his worries. Yoda is state of the art computer animation, and you could say that he reaches the Gollum heights.

Here is another theory about REVENGE OF THE SITH. It's a story about a very creative boy who is torn between the integrity of his guild and the allure of more power elsewhere. And we all know how much Lucas hates studios and movie executives. Palpatine is the embodiment of evil: a studio executive; and the Trade Federation is … Fox Studios? But then, Lucas has always envisioned society as a war between the people and an oppressive government of elders, adults, or officials. AMERICAN Graffiti's teens are the equivalent of the bald masses in THX. If Lucas weren't a filmmaker he'd be one of those guys who lives on an Idaho compound railing against taxation. Wait a minute. Doesn't Lucas actually live on a compound? In any case, STAR WARS now in its entirety is the greatest epic of rebellion against the studio system ever put on film.

Media Notes From All Over

Back in 1999, when THE PHANTOM MENACE arrived, a previously unknown writer over at the DVDJournal name Alexandra DuPont reviewed the film in what amounted to a career-launching explosion of acerbic yet detailed criticism. DuPont then moved over to Ain't It Cool News, where her infrequent reviews of new theatrical were awaited with bated-breath (the slackjawed readers there being unable to master baited breath). DuPont became something of a cult figure on the net, with AICN's 11-year-olds readers fantasizing DuPont as the perfect chick, sexy yet immersed in the geeky world of sci-fi films and TV shows (DuPont with some notable exceptions mostly reviewed FX movies). DuPont wrote some 30 reviews for AICN, along with about 50 DVD reviews for the DVDJ, and even four pieces for WILLAMETTE WEEK, a Portland weekly, according to DuPont's on line bibliography.

Now, seven years later, comes the final STAR WARS movie, and DuPont is on the beat once again to review it — but this time with the announcement that it is to be her last review for Ain't it Cool News, ever. From an intro to the rev by Herc we learn that DuPont has over time parlayed these AICN reviews into an actual paying job with a major publication under her real name.

It's an excellent review, in the usual DuPontian style of a FAQ, and the second half includes the DuPontian take on the forthcoming cult fav SERENITY. In the Talkbacks there is a general gnashing of teeth and rending of Wookie costumes as the nerds wail over the departure of their favorite if unseen fantasy female. One Talkbacker even proposes to show a picture of the real DuPont, shown below, and there is rabid speculation, mostly incoherent, as to DuPont's real identity, EW's Lisa Schwartzbaum and the NY TIMES's Manohla Dargis being two of the crazier candidates — as if they need to write for free behind a pseudonym, or have ever shown much in the way of geek level obsession with STAR WARS.

DuPont, I'm afraid, will remain a mystery until the shadowy figure behind the pseudonym chooses to step forward — or publishes a tell-all book on how to fool GeekWorld. Herc boasts that DuPont was probably the best writer ever to contribute to that site. Well, there is no probably about it. DuPont is or was one of those writers that make you question why you wanted to go into the trade in the first place. Like a Wolcott or a Lane the apercus seemed to flow from the DuPontian pen with ease, such as in the most famous and funniest quote from a review of STAR TREK: NEMESIS: "But excuse me while I climb the lofty slopes of Mt. Obvious and write that "Voyager" and Insurrection are where "Star Trek" really, genuinely lost it — where "Trek" started looking like it was set in a Sheraton hotel lobby and the series became obsessed with maintaining its "universe" and the story editors started piling on temporal anomalies and other ass-forged deus ex machina in a blatant underestimation of their audience and nobody ever got their shirt ripped during a fight or got dirty or drunk or laid." That's tough to compete with.

DuPont will be missed — or not? Somewhere in the nation the real DuPont is people are blithely reading DuPontian prose without even knowing it. In fact, there are broad clues on the AdP bibliography if a savvy enough reader can grok them. Perhaps we should get Don Foster on the case.

Angelina Jolie and boots Angelina Jolie, the fish lipped, knife-wielding, cut-fanatical, incest-flirting, blood sample carting home wrecker can now add another sin to her confession list: boot fetish manufacturer.

If you've seen the new VANITY FAIR, which features Jolie on the cover, you'll know what I mean. Within its pages Jolie is shown frolicking with her adopted son. On a bed. With Jolie garbed in riding boots and jodhpurs like a fetish queen from an old John Willie strip. At one point the little tyke is shown pulling at the boot while Jolie laughingly pulls away.

Perhaps this is a lengthy life long experiment by the science minded Jolie to see if she could induce a boot fetish in her son, like that bizarre behavior psychology experiment a few decades ago in which the mad scientists attempted to induce boot fetishism in a bunch of college students. Perhaps Jolie read that autobiographical R. Crumb comic story in which a tiny Crumb is fixated on the cowboy boots of his mother's friend.

Will young Maddox Chivan Thornton Jolie find himself masturbating to these VF images 10 or 12 years from now (it's OK: they aren't really related). Will he find himself sneaking sly glances at female footwear in on the street or in restaurants and parties? Will he linger in front of department store windows? Will he end up hunting down back issues of BOOT LOVERS DIGEST on Ebay? All because he was a tool of Jolie's bizarre experimentation? What is the world coming to?

Further thoughts on THE STANLEY KUBRICK ARCHIVE : As I grow older and more decrepit I find myself focusing on just a few directors. Hitchcock, Kubrick, The Coens, Maddin, Welles, and a few others. So don't get me wrong, THE STANLEY KUBRICK ARCHIVE (Taschen, 544 pages, $200, ISBN 3822822841), despite what I said last week, is a major publishing event.

But I have a few more questions. The first half of the book consists of frame enlargements from most of Kubrick's films. But that includes images from the first scenes from SPARTACUS, which Kubrick didn't direct (Anthony Mann did) and frames from Dr. STRANGELOVE of A-bombs going off, which were taken by the Army. Is the book praising Kubrick for his handling of stock footage?

On the good side of the scale, though, the images at the front help isolate visual themes and cues to meaning in his movies. For example, I didn't realize until I saw the frames from EYES WIDE SHUT (which include a few uncensored, European-version frames) how much nudity there is in Dr H.'s world, how often naked women are throwing themselves at him. Oh, and the tabbed pages are cool.

DVD DIATRIBE Archives

Regular readers may recall my agonizing difficulties in viewing THE LIFE AQUATIC one horrible Sunday at a Century 16 theater full of gabbing suburbanites, back when the film first came out. Now, fortunately, we have THE LIFE AQUATIC WITH STEVE ZISSOU (The Criterion Collection, No. 300, 2004, $39.95, two discs, Tuesday, May 10, 2005). Anderson has said that he learned how to make movies from Criterion discs, and so it is only right that he should arrange to have Criterion issue his films regardless of the studio making them.

The supplements on this disc are among the most helpful I've encountered for a recent motion picture. From the audio commentary track, conducted in the eatery where Anderson and Baumbach wrote the script, the viewer learns numerous things: that Owen Wilson was imitating actor Will Patton from ARMAGEDDON for the role of Ned, that Anderson has been working on the film for 14 years, and that the scene in which Steve overhears people talking about him was based on something that really happened to actor Chris Eigeman (who got caught bad mouthing an action star), talking about an action star. Anderson sounds a tad like Whit Stillman, and looks like a cross between Tim Burton and Tiny Tim. Disc One also has, in addition to an excellent widescreen transfer (2.35:1, enhanced) and DTS and Dolby Digital 5.1 audio, nine deleted scenes, and a 14 minute "Starz on the Set" making of featurette.

Portholes, one now sees, formed the basis for the film's visual design. Throughout the movie, people are peering at others through small oval openings. Even the cutaway side view of the ship, the most elaborate set for a comedy since THE LADIES' MAN, is in its way a "porthole" to what is otherwise impossible to see.

But is AQUATIC really a comedy? Like Gore Vidal's novel TWO SISTERS, it's about a man late in life confronting the fact that he may have a kid. Or may not (on the yak track the filmmakers make it clear that Ned's ancestry is meant to remain unverified). Ned is, within Anderson's films, an unusually good character, but he dies, just as Steve's best friend has died (before the film starts), and just as Steve also loses Cody, the three legged dog he inherited from the pirates, and even his cat Marmalade is killed by a snake. The whole tone of the film is really that of a 1970s existential film like SAVE THE TIGER, or Fellini films such as 8 1/2. The search for what Steve calls the jaguar shark has all the weighted symbolism of MOBY DICK.

Disney advertised AQUATIC as a comedy. In fact, I think that Disney, as usual, over advertised it, spoiling what jokes there were so that you have the feeling you've already seen the film before it starts. The Criterion disc helps cleanse the palate and see the movie for what it is, a meditation on movie making (as Anderson confirms on the commentary track). There are apparently numerous movie in-jokes besides the obvious Wislett-Richardson moniker.

Disc Two offers a wide variety of equally helpful supplements though on a somewhat difficult to navigate menu. "This Is an Adventure" is an hour long making of directed by, of all people, Albert Maysles, along with Antonio Ferrera and Matthew Prinzing. Added on is "Intern Video Journal" (15:00) shot by actor Matthew Gray Gubler, and showing some of the actors getting rather crabby over his intrusive lens. Anderson and Baumbach appeared together on an Italian television program MONDO MONDA (16:00), which is offered up here, and composer Mark Mothersbaugh, late of Devo, discusses his musical score (19:00). In addition there are five making of featurettes: "Creating a Scene" (4:00), "The Look Aquatic" (5:00), "Costumes" (4:00), "Aquatic Life" (7:00), "Ned" (3:00), and "Jane" (3:00), along with image and design galleries, and the full recordings of the 10 David Bowie songs used in the film performed by Seu Jorge in Portuguese.

The fourth STAR TREK TV series, and the third one in the modern era, STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE: SEASON 1 (Paramount, 2001, $133.95, seven discs, Tuesday, May 3, 2005) turns out to be pretty good (I never saw it on real TV). But it does violate a lot of the unofficial rules of what makes a STAR TREK show.

For one thing, it goes backwards instead of forwards, and aren't way to many TREK shows about disruptions in time? In fact, one of the premises of this series is that time and chronology are under threat. Another is that it opens with a theme song, which apparently ST fans found abhorrent, but which grows on you about 22 hours, as does the credit sequence itself, which includes an acknowledgement of the real world of space flight behind the show itself.

But I don't know if they complained about the worst violation of the essence of the show, as decreed by Gene Rodenberry way back in the dawn of TREK, i.e., that the Enterprise is an ambassador of peace, and that members of the Federation are constrained from intervening in the worlds they are in the process of mapping out.

I'm not sure if Rick Berman is to blame. After all, rooted in the seedbed of classic TREK are many instances of violence and warfare between Kirk and others. But the whole idea perhaps really disintegrated when the Enterprises was turned into a war ship in DEEP SPACE 9.

The clever premise of ENTERPRISE is that, since it takes place a couple of hundred years before classic TREK, nothing works quite right. Say "beam me up" and you may find yourself scrambled. The characters drool over warp speeds that Picard would laugh at. It's all very funny, but can it sustain a show?

I think, yes, and here is why: it's not so much about conflict as about inner conflict (and with luck it will stay a show somewhere; as I write this the fate of ENTERPRISE is still up in the air). In this firs season, the Vulcan's still aren't sure if human beings have the stuff to be ambassadors of deep space exploration. And they may be right, as the captain (played by Scott Bakula in a slightly off parody of a manly Rock Hudson) wrestles with his anger, and his right hand man, Malcolm Reed, also finds himself prone to the much-despised irrationality.

All 26 eps of the first season are available on Paramount's typically masterly boxed set, from two-part pilot "Broken Bow" to cliffhanger "Shockwave." Shot but not aired in high definition widescreen (1.78:1, enhanced), the series looks great, and the Dolby Digital 5.1 is excellent.

Supplements begin with an audio commentary from producers and co-creators Rick Berman and Brandon Braga over "Broken Bow," in which they acknowledge some of the fan-based dissent but don't really try to start another argument.

I'm not sure just exactly who most TV show making of supplements are made for. Those present here do not deviate from the standard formula; informative at times, but also achingly uninteresting. "Creating Enterprise" is a "making of" that lays out the essence of the show, while "O Captain, My Captain!" is a thin profile of Scott Bakula.

"Cast Impressions" is exactly what it sounds like, and "Shuttlepod One," as per usual Paramount practice, focuses on one specific episode. "Star Trek Time Travel: Temporal Cold Wars and Beyond" looks briefly at the running subplot of ENTERPRISE. "Enterprise Secrets" is a thin glance at some of the show's sets. "Admiral Forrest Takes Center Stage" is a character featurette that starts off with a cringe-inducing song dedicated to the recent women of "Trek". The extras, mostly on the 7th disc, close out with outtakes and a commercial for a "Borg Invasion" ride. Deleted scenes are associated with the specific episodes they come from, and Michael and Denise Okuda offer informative optional subtitle text commentary for three episodes. I would also add that the menus here are much easier to use than their equivalents on DEEP SPACE 9.

If you are still in a science fiction mood you might like to add QUATERMASS (A&E, 1979, $39.95, two discs, Tuesday, April 26, 2005) to your collection. It's a late 1970s addition to the mythology about the British scientist who often finds himself solving puzzles that threaten the existence of life on earth. Written by Nigel Kneale, who had conceived of the character way back in the 1950s, it more or less wraps up the Quatermass series, and on an ambiguous note. A parodic portrait of the times (though even then out of date) it pits apocalyptic hippies against a world declining into post-punk brutality as a treat from outer space makes the disputes between the west and the Soviet Union pale in comparison. It also pits old versus young, as Quatermass (the late John Mills) seems weakly grandfatherly as he searches for his granddaughter, who has been absorbed into the hippie cult.

I love the Quatermass series, but love even more its loving recreation in Tobe Hooper's LIFEFORCE, an elaborate homage to the Quatermass series penned by Dan O'Bannon and others from a novel by Colin Wilson. QUATERMASS is a lot tamer, but again it is one of those stiff upper lip British exercises in which appalled scientist cry out "Good god, man," to brutal soldiers.

A&E has honored the dwindling Quatermass fans by gathering onto this set both the original four hour mini series, directed by Piers Haggard, and the 90-minute theatrical release, which cuts out a sizable amount of deadwood from the mini-series. It's an interesting contrast of a full show with what can or has to be done with it for a movie time frame, and illustrates some of the hard choices involved. The transfers are probably as good as can be expected, with the theatrical version a full frame, unenhanced version. There is also a documentary about the "enduring mystery" of Stonehenge, made for the History channel, and that's about it for extras.

I think that at some point in the future when someone writes a book about the genre we will realize that at the other end of his career, after almost inventing film noir Orson Welles also invented the personal, essayistic documentary in F FOR FAKE (The Criterion Collection, No. 288, 1974, $39.95, two discs, Tuesday, April 26, 2005). I suppose that F FOR FAKE is probably for Welles fanatics only. I can't imagine anyone else but them, or students of documentary, or fans of frauds or Howard Hughes getting much out of it, but for those who do get it the film is a witty and even revolutionary work.

Because he was more or less an outsider artist in his later years, Welles made a dramatic shift in his style. Normally a master of the long take and the tracking shot, which is usually a luxury of the studio system and its wealth of resources, Welles in the poverty of his outsider status resorted to editing as his visual signature. He was assembling bits and pieces, and so he evolved, or devolved from Ophuls and Von Sternberg to Eisenstein.

This is most clearly seen in what may be the most significant moment on Criterion's two disc set, an excerpt from one of Welles's unreleased films, THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WIND, which appears near the end of the 1995 documentary ORSON WELLES: THE ONE-MAN BAND. The excerpt shows Oja Kodar having sex in a moving car at night in the rain. Not only does the sequence show late Welles's montage style at its height (fast cutting, but always with clarity), but also it is a rare, perhaps even unique moment of sexual passion in Welles's films. Like many of the top directors, such as Ford and Hawks, but also including younger directors such as Scorsese and Tarantino, who could, Welles was surprisingly modest on screen. I'm not sure why. I think that it is because Welles had a secret, or a secret life that has only been hinted at in even the most recent biographies of the filmmaker.

Is there another director who so radically changed his style? I can't think of one off the top of my head (maybe Eisenstein himself, who went the other way, from choppy editing to long takes with theatrical stagings). I think it is a remarkable story and its reasons are heartbreaking. It has yet to be told, but it could be, because most of Welles's collaborators in his later years are still alive to describe his day-to-day workings.

Such are the thoughts evoked by this marvelous two disc sets. The first Welles DVD from the company, Criterion's transfer of F FOR FAKE is a splendid widescreen image (1.66:1, enhanced) with a good Dolby Digital mono track. Extras on Disc One include an edited commentary track by Kodar and director of photography Gary Graver. Peter Bogdanovich also offers a brief optional video intro to the film. Supplements on Disc Two include the fascinating and exhaustive 88 minute long ORSON WELLES: ONE-MAN BAND. This film more or less comes from the Kodar side of the battleground over Welles estate and legacy, the other side of this windy warfare led by Beatrice Welles, his daughter, who has no presence on the disc. Equally important, at least to F FOR FAKE, is the hour long ALMOST TRUE: THE NOBLE ART OF FORGERY, a TV documentary about art forger Elmyr de Hory which shares footage with F FOR FAKE, and which makes explicit what was only hinted at in Welles's film. Finally, there is a 60 MINUTES segment with Clifford Irving that looks back on his scandal, and excerpts from the 1972 Howard Hughes audio press conference about Irving's bio. Inside the box is a 16-page insert containing an essay by Jonathan Rosenbaum, stills images and frame enlargements, cast and credits, transfer information, and chapter titles.

In one of those coincidences that make movies so magical and which F FOR FAKE celebrates, Welles's film appears within the orbit of THE AVIATOR, itself about to come out on DVD, both films having at their heart the mysterious industrialist Howard Hughes. If your appetite for Hughes is still puckish, then HOWARD HUGHES: THE MAN AND THE MADNESS (MPI, 1999, $14.98, Tuesday, April 26, 2005) fills in the gaps of both films. It follows two other DVD docs about HH, released last year around the time THE AVIATOR came out, and while each of them has something to offer, this one is probably the most comprehensive (although all of them fall short of the sort of gossipy revelations found in Charles Higham's bio of the aviator).

This doc, directed by Greg Newman, surveys Hughes's whole life, with comments from both former friends and associates and the writers of a massive bio of the man. Personally, I don't get the Hughes fascination, however. He was an incompetent lout who crashed nearly every plane he invented, was reckless on his movie sets, became a rabid anti-commie during the blacklist, and has some mysterious connection with the Watergate scandal. To me he seems to be just another dumb, ordinary executive; perhaps the fascination is that such an idiot could rise so far in America's media aristocracy. Oh, maybe that is the fascination for everyone else, too.

In any case, MPI's disc comes with several supplements beyond the film itself, basically five bits of newsreel footage of Hughes at various stages of his career, some covered in THE AVIATOR, some not.

There is one real good reason to watch LICENSE TO DRIVE: SPECIAL EDITION (Anchor Bay [of a Fox film], 1988, $19.98, Tuesday, May 3, 2005) again, or catch up with it for the first time. It's not the cult around the two Coreys, which, if cult there really be, has always baffled me; nor is it the retro fashions of pastel colors, big hair, suit coats shoved up to the elbows, and linen; nor, finally, is it the American love affair with the car, since despite the title cars are not really the center of attention here. No, the reason to watch the film is simple: Heather Graham.

The actress chose not to participate in this special edition. Not hard to see why. But she sure is discussed a lot. It is her first film, and she seems to have emerged out of nowhere. Corey Haim notes that she was a little fussy about kissing him when it became known that he was suffering from mono, but otherwise everyone has nothing but good to say about her. If director Greg Beeman and his casting director live on in memory for nothing else it will be for discovering Heather Graham.

But did they? How do these actors and actresses manage to come "out of nowhere," to become famous overnight? Is it really years of hard work in anonymity? Not in the case of Sylvester Stallone, who was very visible in bit parts in movies for many years before exploding in ROCKY. And Graham appears to have done nothing prior to LICENSE, no modeling, no acting, nothing. How did she get a female lead in a movie?

The answer is simple. Satanism. Like John Cassavetes in ROSEMARY'S BABY, these actors have all sold their souls to the devil for a place on the escalator to the big screen. Only Satan can advance careers with such ease. Only Satan has the time and patience to pick and choose among millions of beautiful men and women and select only a few for worldwide fame. And only Satan can come up with the punishments that inevitably assail those actors and actresses who transgress His rules, as chronicled in the weekly gossip tabloids.

Aside from Graham and Satanism, LICENSE TO DRIVE holds very little interest except to students of 1980s culture and fashions. It does, however, come with a panoply of supplements, as if it, too, were THE AVIATOR. There is a witty, self-deprecating audio commentary track by Beeman and writer Neil Tolkin (who get into a running fight over whether Beeman made Graham wear stockings for a glamour shot), video interviews with Haim (who looks like Chris Penn now, and who admits to regretting his slack-jawed, carp-like approach to acting), and Feldman, plus a deleted, or rather expanded scene, trailers, TV spots, and the whole script on DVD-ROM.

Males of a certain age may recall a program aired on Showtime back in the early days of cable television, at least as it was experienced on the west coast, called AEROBICISE. The show consisted of nothing but women on a slowly spinning dais exercising, as the camera tracked around them counterclockwise. Usually garbed in tight red leotards, the self-absorbed women (and later, after complaints, a few men) were helpless against the intrusive, zooming almost penetrating camera as it peered down cleavage that just "happened" to spin into its plane, and at flexing crotches, the girls doing a doggy style leg thrusting exercise. The show was probably the savior of many a marriage and not because housewives grew fitter.

Fond memories of AEROBICISE were evoked for me by CARMEN ELECTRA'S ADVANCED AEROBIC STRIPTEASE and CARMEN ELECTRA'S LAP DANCE AND HIP-HOP (Paramount, 2003, two discs each set [eight in all], $49.95, Tuesday, April 19, 2005), both being part of CARMEN ELECTRA'S AEROBIC STRIPTEASE COLLECTION. It's another example of a show whose makers can swear seven ways from Sunday is a sincere effort at teaching its viewers about the intricacies of exercise and fitness (and a happy marriage) but which probably has a negligible viewership among actual women. Like AEROBICISE, these videos featuring Carmen Electra (real name, Tara Patrick) strutting, swinging her legs, jutting out her chest and thrusting her buttocks, are really for male viewers, who will apparently take anything even the most remotely sexy even without nudity as long as it has a famous figure (in both senses of the word) at its center.

I'm sure that if there is an athletic housewife out there who really does want to spice up her marriage with a hip hop strip tease, this might be the place to go, and surely safer than visiting an actual lap dance palace. The videos are directed by famed cinematographer Ed Lachman (THE LIMEY, as well as, curiously, a documentary early in his career called STRIPER) without a trace of leering or sniggering winking, so that housewives really could, if they wished, comfortably mimic Carmen's various moves in the privacy of her living room.

And incidentally, if you are interested in KILL BILL, you might find my new book, KILL BILL: AN UNOFFICIAL CASEBOOK useful. It is now available in fine bookstores everywhere, or from Amazon.

NEXT TIME: THE GIRL FROM MONDAY, more Asian action films, movies on music, several STAR TREKS, and more!

E-MAIL THE AUTHOR | ARCHIVES

Mail this page to someone you know.
Recipient's Name:
Recipient's Email:
Sender's Name:
Sender's Email:











Addicted to Bad
by Patrick Keller

International Intrigue
by Alison Veneto

Nocturnal Admissions
by D.K. Holm

Strange Impersonation
by Kim Morgan

Trailer Park
by Christopher Stipp




New DVD Releases
for April 11, 2006

DVD Diatribe
by D.K. Holm

DVD Late Show
by Christopher Mills




Preachin' from the Longbox
by Britt Schramm

Should It Be a Movie?
by Marc Mason

New Comic Book Releases
for April 12, 2006, 2006




New CD Releases
for April 11, 2006

Music for the Masses
by M.C. Bell




TV Recommendations
Boob toob picks of the week by Chris Ryall

Kentucky Fried Rasslin'
by Scott Bowden

TV Pilot Review Archives
by Chris Ryall



                        © Copyright 2002-2006 Movie Poop Shoot